Osama Did It - Get A Life !!

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

I just ordered a book the "inside jobbers" are either going to love or hate

I just ordered Aftermath: World Trade Center Archive (Hardcover)
by Joel Meyerowitz (Author) from Amazon.com

It has 8500 photos of the debris cleanup over the 9 months after the collapse.

It will either:

1. give the CT folks more ammo, or
2. it will amaze them that this was ALLOWED to be published, or
3. it will provide visual proof of no demolition.

So either way, the Inside Jobbers are going to be affected. Can't wait to get my copy.

19 Comments:

  • If you don't care about 9-11, atleast look at the actions of our government since the event. We're talking about over 300,000 dead people in the last 5 years. Dead people that had nothing to do with this attack, no matter what you or I think of the guilty. Dead people with mothers and fathers and sons and daughters, with aunts and uncles and cousins and friends. How many people has this War on Terror aflicted? The blood is on your hands and mine as well, for neither of us has done enough, yet.

    By Anonymous Truthism, at 4:40 PM  

  • cool you read picture books

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:30 PM  

  • it's kind of funny im the only guy that post on your page, and all these CTS have tons! damn you need to work on your marketing, i found you on a truth page after all LOL!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:31 PM  

  • As far as people hitting the page:

    Of course there are far more people on the "inside jobbers" pages because normal people have no reason to think anything other than the official story is what happened.

    People who are desperately trying to prove something they are passionate about spend more time yakking about it on the web.

    My sister, a 35-yr-old woman with three kids and a husband and who lives in West Texas - she had never even HEARD of the "inside job theory" until I told her about my blog.

    Her exact quote when I told her there are people who think the government perpetrated 9-11 attacks:

    "That's the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard."

    Pretty much the response of any normal person.

    Most of American has no reason to think like that because they do not have a bunch of HATE in their blood.

    By Blogger Larry, at 7:25 AM  

  • Larry,

    One day you will understand what it means to be a patriot. It's just a shame that you're taking so long. It's ludacris that you can watch those buildings fall and thing that a fire at the top of them caused it. There is nothing else to look at but the video's of all of the collapses. If you don't' get it, watch them just keep watching them, eventually that chip in your head won't be able to filter the content. You should seriously read a fucking book sometime, it's obvious what america is if you care to take the time to look at our country post ww2. How many countries have we overthrown and istalled ruthless dictators in? I bet you can only think of one, iraq. What makes me so sad is that you won't even look at it, look at south america all of the people we've murdered, iran contra? there's more than i can even remember. There is so much evil going on in the world and you don't even know it, but you like me are finacially supporting it.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:04 AM  

  • http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm

    There are 25 stories you should know about.

    By Anonymous truthism, at 10:05 AM  

  • There is a building inspector guy who had said for YEARS after having a job inspecting the fireproofing on the WTC steel that "if there is a fire above the 64th floor that building is coming down."

    There are MANY other people who are engineers and fire experts who were watching it during the fire who thought it would come down also.

    So don't try to tell me that fire could not take the building down. Did you SEE the huge weight of 30 floors falling down on top of the floor at the bottom of the fire? What do you THINK that floor was supposed to do - support the 30 floors above it ?? C'mon fellas.

    By Blogger Larry, at 10:10 AM  

  • never heard that one, who is this guy?

    The weight should be less than the weight of the bottom of the towers, as the steel would get smaller as it went up. First you have to understand how the buildings where designed, with a central core columns 47 in number, designed to carry the entire weight of the building. Then the exterior skeleton was made to carry 100% of his own load. So, if you are to believe the first "official" theory , that the floors collapsed around the core, like a "spindel" i believe his term was, then you, still have the core columns that should be standing. Let's not forget that there core columns where 3x2 4" thick Box columns at the base. If the building was designed to support more than the weight above, and you have something that takes out columns from one side, then you have heat that weakens columns, how does the structure not topple to the direction of the original impact point? That's the key area i think you fail to consider. Look at the nist reports they show you which columns where damaged, and how hot each of them got. It just doesnt make sense that if one whole side is undamaged and not really getting very hot, even close to structual problems it even still had completely intact fireproofing, how did they too give out at the exact same time?

    By Anonymous truthism, at 10:20 AM  

  • if you want to understand it from an experts point of view, atleast listen to what Jeff King from MIT has to say, he's quick and to the point so it's not a huge waste of time for you. But, what he says if fair and logical i think, let me know what you think...

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8533904938803031452&q=9-11+mit&hl=en

    By Anonymous truthism, at 10:23 AM  

  • Actually, he was not a building inspector - my bad.

    The guy was Herbert Levine, the man who is inventor of the original wet-asbestos spray fireproofing process.

    Look for a PDF on the web called "sounds.pdf" and read the bottom of page 2.

    By Blogger Larry, at 10:24 AM  

  • About the strength of the towers:

    All that is well and good until you factor in the crash of a 757 airplane going 500 miles an hour into the core of the building. Right where those 47 core columns were.

    Most of them did not have to melt because they were sheared off/destroyed by the initial impact of the plane and the fuel explosion.

    By Blogger Larry, at 10:27 AM  

  • OPEN YOUR NIST REPORT! I know for a fact that a majority of those columns where intact, only like 5-7 of them per floor suffered severe damage.

    By Anonymous truthism, at 10:52 AM  

  • it has also been stated that the impacts from the plane was no more than the constant 140mph wind that the buildings where designed for

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:54 AM  

  • why did you give up? did you open your nist report?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:18 AM  

  • How could you say I hate America, when I am defending the fact that

    AMERICA DID NOT ATTACK ITSELF

    why the CTers are saying exactly that?

    By Blogger Larry, at 12:57 PM  

  • On the NIST report:

    Nothing in the page I referenced changes anything in the rest of the report - it just answers questions that the CTers had for NIST after the report was issued.

    The NIST report is the most detailed examination of the WTC events that currently exists.

    If they say only 5-7 of the core supports were damaged, then they are likely to be as correct as anyone else, probably moreso since they did the largest investigation.

    They also say the building was not bombed.

    By Blogger Larry, at 12:58 PM  

  • "...it has also been stated that the impacts from the plane was no more than the constant 140mph wind that the buildings where designed for"

    By whom?

    By Blogger Elmondohummus, at 7:55 PM  

  • They never said the buildings were not bombed. I read the whole thing.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:37 PM  

  • Tell me the truth. Have you read the NIST report? or the FEMA report? or the 9/11 Commission report? Don't lie to me...

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:38 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home